To be able to edit code and run cells, you need to run the notebook yourself. Where would you like to run the notebook?

This notebook takes about 30 seconds to run.

In the cloud (experimental)

Binder is a free, open source service that runs scientific notebooks in the cloud! It will take a while, usually 2-7 minutes to get a session.

On your computer

(Recommended if you want to store your changes.)

  1. Download the notebook:
  2. Run Pluto

    (Also see: How to install Julia and Pluto)

  3. Open the notebook file

    Type the saved filename in the open box.

Frontmatter

If you are publishing this notebook on the web, you can set the parameters below to provide HTML metadata. This is useful for search engines and social media.

Author 1
👀 Reading hidden code
html"""
<picture>
<source srcset="https://gci.iscte-iul.pt/2022/identidade/files/brand_v2/escolas/rgb/ibs/en/horizontal/negative/rgb_ibs_en_horizontal_negative.png" media="(prefers-color-scheme: dark)" width="240px!important" style="float:right;">
<img src="https://gci.iscte-iul.pt/2022/identidade/files/brand_v2/escolas/rgb/ibs/en/horizontal/main/rgb_ibs_en_horizontal_main.png" width="240px" style="float:right;">
</picture>
"""
32.4 μs

Week 10 - Macroeconomic Policy and Extreme Shocks

Exercises

Macroeconomics, ISCTE-IUL

👀 Reading hidden code
3.9 ms

Vivaldo Mendes, Ricardo Gouveia-Mendes, Luís Clemente-Casinhas

May 2025

👀 Reading hidden code
252 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
3.1 ms

Packages used in this notebook

👀 Reading hidden code
173 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
begin
using HypertextLiteral
: @htl, @htl_str
, PlutoUI, PlutoPlotly, StatsBase , ShiftedArrays
using CSV, DataFrames, Dates, PeriodicalDates, NLsolve
end
3.4 ms

👀 Reading hidden code
137 μs

Exercise 1. The Fed's Dual Mandate (again)

👀 Reading hidden code
165 μs

One of the Fed branches—the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago—published an image that explains the Fed's double mandate in a very simple way. The figure can be found below, taken from here.

👀 Reading hidden code
8.4 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
11.4 μs

👉 a) In your own words, what are the two fundamental goals of the Fed over time?

👀 Reading hidden code
185 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
3.5 ms

👉 b) Given what you have studied in this course, suppose the natural unemployment (Un) rate is 4%, and the current level of unemployment is U=6%. What would we expect the Fed's reaction would be?

👀 Reading hidden code
7.4 ms

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
144 μs

👉 c) Given what you have studied in this course, suppose the rate of inflation (π) is 5%, while the target rate of inflation is (πT) is 2%. What would we expect the Fed's reaction would be?

👀 Reading hidden code
235 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
143 μs

👉 d) Suppose that the two cases above co-exist simultaneously. What should the Fed do in this case? Give up one of them, give up both, or balance both in some way?

👀 Reading hidden code
165 μs

Answer (d)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
164 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
126 μs

Exercise 2. Unemployment and recessions

👀 Reading hidden code
182 μs

The following figure presents the evolution of the unemployment rate (UR) and the Fed Funds Rate (FFR) for the US economy from the mid 1960s to 2024.

👀 Reading hidden code
150 μs
197019801990200020102020051015
URFFRUnemployment Rate (UR) and the Fed Funds Rate (FFR)DatePercentageShaded bars: NBER recessions
👀 Reading hidden code
50.0 ms

👉 a) What happens to the unemployment rate in every single recession in this period? Why?

👀 Reading hidden code
174 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
129 μs

👉 b) What happens to the Fed Funds Rate in every single recession in this period? Why?

👀 Reading hidden code
209 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
136 μs

👉 c) The following figure presents a cross-plot between the US's unemployment and Fed Funds rates between 1955 and 2024, and the correlation coefficient between these two variables is close to zero (0.063). Given this evidence and the theory that we have studied, in your opinion, what is the correct remark: (i) there is no causality between these two macroeconomic variables; (ii) if the Fed reduces the FFR, the unemployment rate goes up; (iii) if unemployment is very high, it has to come down, and the Fed is forced to reduce the FFR.

👀 Reading hidden code
215 μs
0510152034567891011
Unemployment rate vs. Fed Funds Rate (US: 1955-2024)Fed Funds Rate (FFR)Unemployment rate (UR)
👀 Reading hidden code
107 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
151 μs

👉 d) Are there other major macroeconomic variables that directly affect the decision of the Fed regarding the FFR? If yes, what are they?

👀 Reading hidden code
187 μs

Note

The main reason macroeconomic theory is helpful is that it prevents us from making stupid mistakes that are masked as irrefutable observations. It is easy to see that in the plot above, there is no significant correlation between these two macroeconomic aggregates. Therefore, we would be inclined to prematurely conclude that the Fed does not react to unemployment. Why is this speedy reasoning incorrect?

👀 Reading hidden code
138 μs

Answer (d)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
114 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
111 μs

Exercise 3. Inflation targeting

👀 Reading hidden code
135 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
7.8 μs

On 8 July 2021, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced a revision of its monetary policy strategy for the first time since its creation in 1998. From the article above in the Financial Times, one can read:

"The central bank said its new target of 2 per cent was symmetric, “meaning negative and positive deviations of inflation from the target are equally undesirable”. The new target is a medium-term objective with flexibility to fluctuate in either direction in the short term [and] said it could tolerate temporary moves beyond that point, in a shift that gives policymakers flexibility to keep interest rates at historic lows for longer”.

👉 a) Figure 1 plots the data about inflation in the EuroZone (EZ) and Portugal since 1998. Why do you think the ECB stresses "the symmetric deviations of inflation from the target"?

👀 Reading hidden code
266 μs
20002005201020152020−2−1012345
EuroZonePortugalFig 1. Inflation in the EuroZone and PortugalMonthly obervationsPercentage pointsTarget inflation rate (2%)
👀 Reading hidden code
182 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
151 μs

👉 b) Why do you think the article stresses "...in a shift that gives policymakers flexibility to keep interest rates at historic lows for longer”?

👀 Reading hidden code
157 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
202 μs

👉 c) Figure 2 below shows the inflation deviations from its target, according to the old strategy (we will call it "Loss1"), while Figure 3 displays the deviations according to the new strategy ("Loss2").

👀 Reading hidden code
179 μs

Note

If central banks do not achieve the 2% target level for inflation, they do their job poorly. They will be penalized sooner or later because the economy (and society) suffers a Loss of welfare from those deviations. The greater the deviations, the greater will be Loss society will bear.

👀 Reading hidden code
168 μs
2000200520102015202000.511.522.533.542000200520102015202000.511.522.533.54
EuroZonePortugalEuroZonePortugalMonthly observationsMonthly observationsPercentage pointsPercentage pointsFig 2. Positive Deviations from TargetFig 3. Positive & Negative Deviations from Target
👀 Reading hidden code
657 μs
Loss to societymeanminmedianmaxstandard dev.
Euro Zone (Ceiling)0.17990.00.02.10.3579
Euro Zone (True target)0.75680.00.62.60.6422
Portugal (Ceiling)0.50810.00.03.10.7180
Portugal (True target)1.20810.01.23.80.8148
👀 Reading hidden code
73.9 ms

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
150 μs

👉 d) If you had responsibilities as a watchdog of the European Central Bank (for example, as a member of the European Parliament), and the ECB President argued that they had been doing a good job because the Loss to society was very small according to the old strategy, what would your position be?

👀 Reading hidden code
176 μs

Answer (d)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
144 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
134 μs

Exercise 4. The Textbook Rule (MP curve)

👀 Reading hidden code
148 μs

In week 5 we introduced the MP curve into our framework:

(1)r=r+λπ

where r stands for the real interest rate, π for the inflation rate, r as the natural real interest rate, and λ is a parameter that shows how much central banks dislike inflation. This curve was supposed to express the way the central bank sets the nominal interest rate by using this curve in connection with the Fisher equation that we studied in week 3:

(2)i=r+π

where i is the nominal interest rate. By inserting eq. (1) into eq. (2), we get the nominal interest rate that the central bank should set:

(3)i=r+(1+λ)π

Interestingly, we can easily check whether a central bank (like the Fed) followed such a rule (MP curve) to set its nominal interest rates. We can collect data on i, on π, give reasonable values for r and λ, and see if the Fed followed this rule. Let us assume that r=2% and λ=0.5. The data is in the file "Taylor.csv" and can be found in the table below.

👀 Reading hidden code
358 μs
QuartersPotGDPGDPCPIFFR
DateFloat64Float64Float64Float64
1
1960-01-01
3491.81
3517.18
1.4
3.93
2
1960-04-01
3527.85
3498.25
1.8
3.7
3
1960-07-01
3563.32
3515.39
1.4
2.94
4
1960-10-01
3597.51
3470.28
1.4
2.3
5
1961-01-01
3631.1
3493.7
1.5
2.0
6
1961-04-01
3662.76
3553.02
0.9
1.73
7
1961-07-01
3695.59
3621.25
1.2
1.68
8
1961-10-01
3729.38
3692.29
0.7
2.4
9
1962-01-01
3765.8
3758.15
0.9
2.46
10
1962-04-01
3805.31
3792.15
1.3
2.61
more
259
2024-07-01
22800.6
23386.2
2.6
5.26
👀 Reading hidden code
784 μs
begin
r̄ = 2 ; λ = 0.5 # Exogenous variables & parameters
π = Rules_Data.CPI ; i = Rules_Data.FFR # Data about π and i
textbook_rule = r̄ .+ (1.0 .+ λ) .* π # the textbook rule
end;
👀 Reading hidden code
7.1 μs

👉 a) In the figures below, we plot the Federal Funds Rate (the FFR, our i in the equations above) and its value according to the rule presented by the textbook. Do you think the textbook rule does an excellent job of explaining the decisions of the Fed regarding interest rates?

👀 Reading hidden code
189 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
129 μs
196019701980199020002010202005101520251960197019801990200020102020051015
Textbook RuleFFRTextbook rule versus the Federal Funds RateTextbook rule minus the Federal Funds Rate
👀 Reading hidden code
234 μs

👉 b) Given what we discussed in Exercise 1, in your opinion, why does the textbook rule perform so poorly in the case of the Fed?

👀 Reading hidden code
168 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
145 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
122 μs

Exercise 5. The Taylor rule

👀 Reading hidden code
143 μs

In 1993, John Taylor from Stanford University presented a monetary policy rule that became very famous. He conjectured that the Fed, according to its dual mandate, should set nominal interest rates according to the equation:

(Taylor Rule)i=r¯+π+λππgap+λyYgap

where πgap=ππT is the inflation gap between the actual rate of inflation and the target inflation rate, while Ygap=YYPYP is the output gap in percentage units. Taylor suggested that the weights for the inflation gap and the output gap should be similar (λπ=λy=0.5), and the natural real interest rate should be r=2%.

We will apply the same procedure as in the previous exercise. Let us insert the data into the notebook:

👀 Reading hidden code
271 μs
begin
λ_π = 0.5 ; λ_y = 0.5 ; πᵀ = 2.0 # Exogenous variables & parameters for this rule
Y = Rules_Data.GDP ; Yᴾ = Rules_Data.PotGDP # Data about Y, Yᴾ (π and i already inserted in the previous exercise)

Taylor_rule = r̄ .+ π .+ λ_π .* (π .- πᵀ) .+ λ_y .* (100 .* ((Y .- Yᴾ) ./ Yᴾ)) # The Taylor rule ( 100 is used to express the output gap in percentage points (for example, 2pp instead of 0.02)

end;
👀 Reading hidden code
22.6 μs

👉 a) In the figure below, we compare what the Taylor Rule predicts against the nominal interest rate that the Fed actually sets (the FFR). Does this rule better explain the Fed's decisions concerning the Fed Funds Rate than the textbook rule?

👀 Reading hidden code
402 μs
1960197019801990200020102020−5051015201960197019801990200020102020−50510
Taylor RuleFFRTaylor rule versus the Federal Funds RateTaylor rule minus the Federal Funds Rate
👀 Reading hidden code
222 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
130 μs

👉 b) Can you provide evidence that having a Taylor Rule in autopilot may lead to extreme "punishments" for the economy? Examples where applying this rule would lead to unbearable economic situations.

👀 Reading hidden code
17.6 ms

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
152 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
158 μs

Exercise 6. A Good Rule: the "First-Difference" rule

👀 Reading hidden code
203 μs

The Taylor rule is one of the rules the Fed uses when deciding to change (or maintain) nominal interest rates, and, as we saw in the previous exercise, it does not perform very well. That is why the Fed uses also other rules. In this website Policy Rules and How Policymakers Use Them, the Fed describes five different rules that it usually takes into consideration in its decision-making process. One of them is called "The First-Difference" rule and is expressed as follows:

it=FFRt1+0.1(πtπT)+0.1(ytyt4)

where FFRt1 denotes the actual federal funds rate for quarter t1, yt is the natural logarithm of real GDP in quarter t, and yt4 is the natural logarithm of real GDP in quarter t4.

👀 Reading hidden code
369 μs

👉 a) In the figure below, we plot the First-Difference rule and the actual Fed Funds Rate. Considering the gaps between what the rule predicts and the actual Fed Funds Rate, does this new rule perform better or worse than the Taylor rule seen in the previous exercise?

👀 Reading hidden code
193 μs
1960197019801990200020102020051015197019801990200020102020−4−2024
First-Difference RuleFFRThe First-Difference rule versus the Federal Funds RateThe First-Difference rule minus the Federal Funds Rate
👀 Reading hidden code
115 ms

Answer (a)

The First-Difference rule performs much better than the Taylor rule, for two reasons: (i) the gaps between what the rule predicts and the actual Fed Funds Rate are much smaller than in the case of the Taylor rule, and (ii) the First-Difference rule does not lead to extremely abnormal outcomes like the Taylor rule does (e.g., –3% in April 2020, and +13.4% in April 2022).

👀 Reading hidden code
314 μs

👉 b) What happens when extreme events knock-on economic activity when compared to the Taylor rule? For example, what happened during the Great Recession of 2008-2010, the Covid pandemic in 2020, or the recent rampant inflation in 2022/2023?

👀 Reading hidden code
264 μs

Answer (b)

When the economy faces extreme events like those mentioned in the question above, this rule avoids the dramatic changes in the Fed Funds Rate as those that arise from the Taylor rule. For example, consider what happened in July 2009 (in the middle of the Great Recession): the Taylor rule indicated that the Fed should have reduced the Fed Funds Rate to 4.2% (a value that looks impossible to implement), while the First-Difference rule gives a value of 0.27%, which is a much more acceptable value for such a rate. The same reasoning can be applied to the other two extreme events.

👀 Reading hidden code
187 μs

👉 c) Given the evidence in the three rules that we have been discussing, are monetary policy rules useless?

👀 Reading hidden code
190 μs

Answer (c)

Bad rules are useless, but good rules are beneficial because if the central bank follows good rules when conducting monetary policy, there will be less uncertainty in the economy. This less uncertainty arises because private agents know that the central bank has a rule, a sound/credible rule, has a commitment to follow such rule, and they will react to the shocks that hit the economy in accordance with the behavior of the central bank. Private agents know what to expect from the central bank, and this reduces uncertainty.

👀 Reading hidden code
182 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
119 μs

Exercise 7. The Volcker Disinflation, 1980–1986

👀 Reading hidden code
143 μs

On page 309 in the textbook:

"When Paul Volcker became the chairman of the Federal Reserve in August 1979, inflation had spun out of control, and the inflation rate exceeded 10%. Volcker was determined to get inflation down. By early 1981, the Federal Reserve had raised the federal funds rate to over 20%, which led to a sharp increase in real interest rates. Volcker successfully brought inflation down, with the inflation rate falling from 13.5% in 1980 to 1.9% in 1986. The decline in inflation came at a high cost: the economy experienced the worst recession up to that time since World War II, with the unemployment rate soaring to 9.7% in 1982."

In the two figures below, we provide further context for this period by providing evidence about the inflation rate (we use headline inflation in this exercise), the Fed Funds Rate (FFR), and the growth rate of international oil prices.

👀 Reading hidden code
272 μs
197619781980198219841986198819905101520
InflationFFRHeadline Inflation and FFR (1975-1990)DateValuesVolcker tenure as Fed's Chair
👀 Reading hidden code
199 μs
197619781980198219841986198819902468101214−50050100150
InflationOil prices growthHeadline Inflation vs Growth Rate of Oil Prices (1975-1990)DateInflation (Left)Grwoth of Oil Prices (Right)Volcker tenure as Fed's Chair
👀 Reading hidden code
166 μs

👉 (a) What was the Volcker disinflation?

👀 Reading hidden code
197 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
136 μs

👉 (b) By inspecting the two figures above, which cover the period of the Volcker disinflation, how does the behavior of the Fed Funds Rate and international oil prices affect the US economy?

👀 Reading hidden code
201 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
139 μs

👉 (c) Can we explain that sharp decline in inflation in the 1980s using our AD/AS/MP model?**

👀 Reading hidden code
201 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
140 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
124 μs

Exercise 8. Inflation and the Scariest Opinion of 2022

👀 Reading hidden code
138 μs

In the Wall Street Journal, Sept. 7, 2022, Jason Furman – a Professor at Harvard University and a former Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers of President Barack Obama – published an Op-Ed. that ran with the title "Inflation and the Scariest Economics Paper of 2022". The scariest paper can be found here and was written by two IMF economists and Larry Ball from John Hopkins University. The principal message from this paper was:

"To bring price increases down to 2%, we may need to tolerate unemployment of 6.5% for two years."

Earlier, on June 20 of the same year, another highly respected economist, Larry Summers, made the same point even more forcefully in a speech in London:

"We need five years of unemployment above 5% to contain inflation – in other words, we need two years of 7.5% unemployment, or five years of 6% unemployment, or one year of 10% unemployment." Bloomberg

Considering the evolution of inflation (CPI), unemployment (UR), and oil prices (Oil) in the US economy that is depicted in the figure below, answer the following questions:

👉 a) why do you think economists and policymakers were so worried about inflation in the middle of 2022?

👀 Reading hidden code
407 μs
2016201720182019202020212022202320240246810121420406080100120
CPIUROilThe Scary Paper and Some DataCPI and UR: percentage pointsOil price: dollars per barrel
👀 Reading hidden code
1.3 ms

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
144 μs

👉 b) In the case of those two economists mentioned above, what was the reason (or factor) causing so much inflation in the US?

👀 Reading hidden code
170 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
141 μs

👉 c) Given the evidence in the figure above, since June 2022, inflation has come down in the US, achieved without any significant increase in the unemployment rate. Were the two economists above correct in their recipe for the problem of controlling inflation?

👀 Reading hidden code
196 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
131 μs

👉 d) Those two economists based their prescriptions on one fundamental diagnosis: rampant inflation resulted from a "too hot" labor market. By checking the figure above, can you see any connection between oil price increases and inflation?

👀 Reading hidden code
155 μs

Answer (d)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
116 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
112 μs

Exercise 9. Abenomics and Japanese deflation

👀 Reading hidden code
135 μs

In our classes, we discussed the terrible problem that deflation may bring to developed market economies. Japan is a classic example of a highly successful developed economy that was successful until the late 1990s but has fallen into a deflation trap since then.

The following figure presents Japan's inflation and unemployment evolution over the last four decades. Discounting the period of Abenomics — Shinzo Abe was the prime minister between 2013 and 2020 and was elected on the promise that he would take "all necessary and sufficient measures to ensure the country will eradicate deflation" — Japan has been stuck in deflation since the summer of 1998.

👉 a) Considering its target inflation rate of 2%, how frequently did Japan reach such a target since 1998-M07?

👀 Reading hidden code
230 μs
19911994199720002003200620092012201520182021−20246
URCPIInflation (CPI) and Unemployment (UR) Rates in Japan: 1991-2021Monthly observationsPercentage points1998-M07Shinzo Abe as prime-minister
👀 Reading hidden code
235 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
166 μs

👉 b) In normal conditions, if an economy suffers from very low inflation, it will experience high unemployment rates. This relationship is what the Phillips curve tells us. Can we observe this situation in Japan since 1998-M07?

👀 Reading hidden code
166 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
140 μs

👉 c) The unemployment rate in Japan is very low indeed. It is implausible that this rate can go lower than 2% or 3%. This information tells us something about Potential GDP. What is it?

👀 Reading hidden code
243 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
139 μs

👉 d) Someone asks you to create a slogan to describe the Japanese experience above. What would you propose?

👀 Reading hidden code
147 μs

One possible answer (d)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
132 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
111 μs

Exercise 10. The Zero Lower Bound: a numerical exercise

👀 Reading hidden code
155 μs

Consider the four fundamental functions that allow us to analyze the entire functioning of the economy:

AD:Y=mAmϕ(r+λπ)AS:π=πe+γ(YYP)+ρMP:r=r+λπFisher Eq.:i=r+π

and the following information concerning exogenous variables and parameters:

A=7.6 , m=2.0 , ϕ=0.2 , r=2.0 , λ=0.5 , πe=2.0 , γ=4.5 , YP=14.0 , ρ=0.

First, we must pass the information about exogenous variables and parameters into the notebook:

👀 Reading hidden code
254 μs
begin
Ā3 = 7.6 ; λ3 = 0.5 ; m3 = 2.0 ; ϕ3 = 0.2; r̄3 = 2.0 # Demand-side parameters and exogenous variables
γ3 = 4.5 ; Yᴾ3 = 14.0 ; πᵉ3 = 2.0 ; ρ3 = 0.0 # Supply-side parameters and exogenous variables
end;
👀 Reading hidden code
38.5 μs

Note

This exercise continues the previous weeks' exercises by adding a new ingredient: the Zero Lower Bound (ZLB) on interest rates. As the impact of the ZLB will arrive from question (b) onwards, the answer to question (a) will already be given here because it follows the same steps as in previous weeks.

Note that to simplify things, we continue to use the same strategy as before: {πe,r,r,i,ρ} are rates and are measured in percentage points (e.g., 2.0 means 2.0%), while {Y,YP,A} are measured in trillion dollars. In the solutions below, to avoid doubt, we put the symbol % only at the final step of the solutions.

👀 Reading hidden code
205 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
127 μs

👉 a) Calculate the short-run equilibrium values for the inflation rate, the level of GDP, the real interest rate, and the nominal interest rate. The graphical representation of this equilibrium is displayed in Fig. 4 and 5.

👀 Reading hidden code
187 μs

Solution using NLsolve

👀 Reading hidden code
8.2 ms
begin
function my_model10_3!(F, v) # we name our model as model10_3
π = v[1] # variable 1 is π
Y = v[2] # variable 2 is Y
r = v[3] # variable 3 is r
i = v[4] # variable 4 is i
F[1] = m3 * Ā3 - m3 * ϕ3 * (r̄3 + λ3 * π) - Y # AD curve = 0
F[2] = πᵉ3 + γ3 * (Y - Yᴾ3) - π # AS curve = 0
F[3] = r̄3 + λ3 * π - r # MP curve = 0
F[4] = π + r - i # Fisher equation = 0
end

solution10_3 = nlsolve(my_model10_3!, [0.0; 0.0; 0.0; 0.0])
solution10_3.zero
end
👀 Reading hidden code
142 ms

Answer (a)

here

👀 Reading hidden code
154 μs
122.533.544.5012345113.613.81414.214.4012345
MPEq1YpADASEq1Real interest rate (r)GDP trillion dollars (Y)Rate of inflation (π)Rate of inflation (π)Fig 4. MP CurveFig 5. Macroeconomic Equilibrium
👀 Reading hidden code
1.1 ms

Hint

The rate of inflation that corresponds to the ZLB is easy to obtain. We just have to recall that

πZL=r1+λ

👀 Reading hidden code
152 μs

👉 b) Calculate the inflation rate value that corresponds to the ZLB (Zero Lower Bound).

👀 Reading hidden code
173 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
59.9 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
136 μs

👉 c) In Fig. 6 and 7, we represent the equilibrium associated with the AS/AD curves graphically (including the part related to the ZLB), and we do the same for the MP curve. Is the equilibrium in the ZLB?

👀 Reading hidden code
169 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
188 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
142 μs

Exercise 11. A negative demand shock and the ZLB

👀 Reading hidden code
152 μs

Consider the same values as in the previous exercise. However, an external shock affects the Autonomous Demand, which decreases A by $0.2 trillion.

👉 a) The short-run equilibrium values for the inflation rate, the level of GDP, and the real interest rate are represented in Figs 8 and 9. What is the level of the nominal interest rate in this equilibrium?

👀 Reading hidden code
28.0 ms

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
185 μs
211234−4−3−2−1012341213.51414.5−4−3−2−101234
Eq2Eq1MPMPzlZLBADADzlZLBYpASEq1Eq2Real interest rate (% points)GDP trillion dollars (Y)Rate of inflation (% points)Rate of inflation (% points)Fig 8. The MP Curve with a ZLBFig 9. The AD/AS Curves with a ZLB
👀 Reading hidden code
839 μs

👉 b) Is the economy in a recession, or in an economic boom? Justify.

👀 Reading hidden code
170 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
126 μs

👉 c) If there is no other demand or supply shock what will happen to the economy over time?

👀 Reading hidden code
149 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
117 μs

👉 d) What will be the new value of the long-run equilibrium inflation rate? What about the real and nominal interest rates?

👀 Reading hidden code
145 μs

Note

To answer question (d), we have to represent this new equilibrium graphically by using the slider self_correction7. By how much will inflation decline such that the new AS function will cross the YP curve at 0%? A quick inspection of the plots above will tell us that the self-correcting mechanism will force inflation to go down by 2 percentage points. We can call this mechanism by "self_correction".

👀 Reading hidden code
554 μs

self_correction7 =0.0

👀 Reading hidden code
520 μs
1231234−4−3−2−10123412313.51414.5−4−3−2−101234
Eq1Eq2Eq3MPMPzlZLBYpASAS2ADADzlZLBEq1Eq2Eq3Real interest rate (% points)GDP trillion dollars (Y)Rate of inflation (% points)Rate of inflation (% points)Fig 8. The MP Curve with a ZLBFig 9. The AD/AS Curves with a ZLB
👀 Reading hidden code
857 μs

Answer (d)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
157 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
125 μs

Exercise 12. Stuck in deflation (not covered in classes)

👀 Reading hidden code
141 μs

Consider an economy that, for some reason, finds itself in an equilibrium inside the ZLB zone, as in point 1zl in the figure below. Suppose there are no more shocks on the demand or supply sides.

👉 a) Is 1ZL an equilibrium point for this economy?

👀 Reading hidden code
203 μs

self_correction8 =0.0

👀 Reading hidden code
494 μs
1zl2zl1313.213.413.613.81414.214.4−5−4−3−2−10
ASAS2ADzlZLBYpEq1Eq2Stuck in deflationGDP trillion dollars (Y)Rate of inflation (% points)
👀 Reading hidden code
401 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
145 μs

👉 b) Using the slider self_correction8 and the figure below, show the long-term equilibrium in this economy.

👀 Reading hidden code
166 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
158 μs

👉 c) Can you propose one policy measure to help this economy escape the deflation trap at point 2zl?

👀 Reading hidden code
171 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
146 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
128 μs

Exercise 13. Secular stagnation (not covered in classes)

👀 Reading hidden code
152 μs

Consider that initially, the economy is at point 1 in the figure below but suffers a huge negative external shock on aggregate demand: ΔA=0.5 trillion dollars. The impact of this shock can be seen in the movement of the economy to point 2 below. If the economy is at point 2, what will happen to it over time? Answer this question by maniputaing the slider self_correction9 below.

👀 Reading hidden code
193 μs

ΔĀ9 =-0.5

self_correction9 =0.0

👀 Reading hidden code
925 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
399 μs
1231313.213.413.613.81414.2−3−2−10123
AS2YpADADzlZLBASEq1Eq2Eq3Secular stagnationGDP trillion dollars (Y)Rate of inflation (% points)
👀 Reading hidden code
571 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
7.3 μs

Answer

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
182 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
135 μs

Exercise 14. Deflation trap: the good & the bad equilibrium ⛔

👀 Reading hidden code
151 μs

Note

This exercise is a complex one (it is hard to solve). For this reason, it is not compulsory. Read this exercise only if you like macroeconomics a lot and want to move to a more demanding level in this field.

👀 Reading hidden code
147 μs

Consider the data from Exercise 10. However, due to the falling oil prices in international markets, supply suffers a positive shock of Δρ=2.0. Simultaneously, inflation expectations fall by 2 percentage points; the new value for inflation expectations is πe=0%. These impacts can be seen in the figure below. What will happen to the economy if there is no active fiscal policy?

👀 Reading hidden code
175 μs
ρ6 = -2.0 ; πᵉ6 = 0.0;
👀 Reading hidden code
9.7 μs
122zl31313.51414.515−6−4−202468
ASASADADzlZLBYpEq1Eq2Eq2zlEq3Deflation trap: the good & the bad equilibriumGDP trillion dollars (Y)Rate of inflation (% points)
👀 Reading hidden code
486 μs

Answer

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
157 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
133 μs

Exercise 15. The trouble with inflation (optional)

👀 Reading hidden code
154 μs

The figure below shows the main contributors to inflation in October 2022 in the USA. The inflation rate for all items was 0.4% between October and September 2022. This monthly inflation rate would correspond to annual inflation of 4.9% if the same 0.4% were verified in all following months ((1+0.004)121=0.049). In September, the monthly inflation rate between August and September 2022 was 0.6%, leading to an annual inflation rate of 7.44%.

👉 a) If this trend continues over time, what does it tell us about the behavior of inflation?

👀 Reading hidden code
245 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
12.4 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
149 μs

👉 b) Looking at the various items in the figure below, what items mainly contributed to the inflation rate in October 2022?

👀 Reading hidden code
239 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
182 μs

👉 c) Can the Fed do anything to control the prices of those items most responsible for the October inflation?

👀 Reading hidden code
170 μs

Answer (c)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
140 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
127 μs

Exercise 16. New Taylor Rule: more emphasis on the output-gap

👀 Reading hidden code
176 μs

Various economists have suggested that the original Taylor rule gives too little weight to the output gap. The (New) Taylor Rule puts a higher weight on that gap, and we will see that it performs much better than the original one. The curve has the same expression, with the only difference that now we will have (λπ=0.5, λy=1.0).

👀 Reading hidden code
227 μs
Taylor_new = r̄ .+ π .+ λ_π .* (π .- πᵀ) .+ (λ_y .+ Δλ_y) .* (100 .* ((Y .- Yᴾ) ./ Yᴾ));
👀 Reading hidden code
18.8 μs

Note

The slider below Δλ_y=0.5 tells us that the central bank is more concerned about the output-gap than in the original version of the rule (where λ_y=0.5 and Δλ_y=0). See what happens by changing the value of this slider.

👀 Reading hidden code
159 μs

👉 a) Despite performing better that the original Taylor rule, what happens when extreme events knock on ecoonomic activity? Like, for example, the Great Recession of 2008-2010, the Covid pandemic in 2020, or the recent rampant inflat in 2022/20223?

👀 Reading hidden code
179 μs

Δλ_y =0.5

👀 Reading hidden code
509 μs
1960197019801990200020102020−5051015201960197019801990200020102020−10−5051015
New Taylor RuleFFRNew Taylor rule versus the Federal Funds RateNew Taylor rule minus the Federal Funds Rate
👀 Reading hidden code
233 μs

Answer (a)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
163 μs

👉 b) Given the evidence in these three rules, are monetary policy rules useless?

👀 Reading hidden code
163 μs

Answer (b)

Here

👀 Reading hidden code
130 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
192 μs

Reality Check

👀 Reading hidden code
156 μs

Application 1

An important speech by Jerome Powell, Fed's Chair

👀 Reading hidden code
302 μs

Jerome Powel (2020) in a speech at the Conference “Navigating the Decade Ahead: Implications for Monetary Policy,” symposium sponsored by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, August 27, 2020, with the title "New Economic Challenges and the Fed’s Monetary Policy Review" mentioned the following:

"Inflation that runs below its desired level can lead to an unwelcome fall in longer-term inflation expectations, which, in turn, can pull actual inflation even lower, resulting in an adverse cycle of ever-lower inflation and inflation expectation.

This dynamic is a problem because expected inflation feeds directly into the general level of interest rates. Well-anchored inflation expectations are critical for giving the Fed the latitude to support employment when necessary without destabilizing inflation. But if inflation expectations fall below our 2 percent objective, interest rates would decline in tandem. In turn, we would have less scope to cut interest rates to boost employment during an economic downturn, further diminishing our capacity to stabilize the economy through cutting interest rates. We have seen this adverse dynamic play out in other major economies around the world and have learned that once it sets in, it can be very difficult to overcome. We want to do what we can to prevent such a dynamic from happening here.” (page 8/9)

Do you see any connection between what we discussed during this week and the great concerns of the President (Chair) of the Federal Reserve Board of the USA in his most relevant speech in 2020? Do you think that the problems of deflation and lower inflation expectations are irrelevant issues in modern macroeconomics?

👀 Reading hidden code
367 μs

Hint

This speech touches on all major points covered this week: the fear of deflation, the importance of inflation expectations, the relevance of having a 2% target interest rate, and a responsible central should do all it takes to prevent deflation from setting in.

👀 Reading hidden code
168 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
125 μs

Application 2

Ignore Japan at your peril

👀 Reading hidden code
169 μs
19911994199720002003200620092012201520182021−20246
URCPIInflation (CPI) and Unemployment (UR) Rates in Japan: 1991-2021Monthly observationsPercentage points1998-M07Shinzo Abe as prime-minister
👀 Reading hidden code
206 μs

It is incredible how a developed, democratic, and open society fell into the deflation trap in the late 1990s, even though successive governments and central bank presidents tried to avoid such a situation. The central bank of Japan has an inflation target of 2%, like most developed economies. However, from mid-1998 until 2021, Japan could only achieve such a target in 12 out of the 264 months. In fact, most of the time, Japan has experienced quite severe deflation (-1%, -2%, and even -2.5%), some of them for extended periods. Surprisingly, despite significant deflation, the Japanese economy has displayed relatively low unemployment rates.

Can we explain this Japanese case using our model? And with our exercises above? Yes, from Exercise 8 onwards we can easily explain the Japanese case. Why has Japan not been able to escape from the long-term equilibrium inside the ZLB? Some influential economists had argued that in the past – before 2013, when Prime Minister Shinzo Abe came to power and nominated a new Governor of the Central Bank of Japan – Japanese governments and the central bank did not take the necessary measures to avoid the economy diving into the deflationary trap. They only took timid measures to deal with an exceptional danger, and the trap settled in. The positive impact on inflation of the measures taken by Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and his appointed Bank of Japan Governor (Haruhiko Kuroda) after 2013 can be easily seen in the figure above. Since 2013, the number of months with positive inflation has been much greater than those with deflation, which is a very different picture from what had happened before.

👀 Reading hidden code
387 μs

👀 Reading hidden code
133 μs

Auxiliary cells (do not delete)

👀 Reading hidden code
142 μs
TableOfContents()
👀 Reading hidden code
44 ns
Data files used in this notebook
  • NBER_Recessions.csv

  • UR_FFR.csv

  • EZ_inflation.csv

  • Taylor.csv

  • FFRCPIOil.csv

  • Scary_Paper.csv

  • JapanDeflationV1.csv

These CSV files must be kept in the same folder as this notebook.

👀 Reading hidden code
8.7 ms

CSS code

👀 Reading hidden code
217 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
2.6 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
6.0 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
380 ms

Exercise 2. Supporting cells (Unemployment and recessions)

👀 Reading hidden code
156 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
3.1 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
632 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
693 μs

Exercise 3. Supporting cells (Inflation targetting)

👀 Reading hidden code
155 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
264 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
45 ns
👀 Reading hidden code
716 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
28.9 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
35.3 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
30.5 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
41.7 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
58.1 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
49.8 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
72.1 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
141 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
133 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
130 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
131 μs

Exercise 4+5+6+16. Supporting cells (Taylor rule)

👀 Reading hidden code
173 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
32 ns
👀 Reading hidden code
8.4 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
132 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
8.6 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
72.8 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
7.4 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
7.7 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
269 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
22.8 μs

Exercise 7. Supporting cells (Volcker disinflation)

👀 Reading hidden code
163 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
936 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
5.2 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
3.5 μs

Exercise 4. Supporting cells (Scary paper)

👀 Reading hidden code
155 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
476 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
34 ns
👀 Reading hidden code
1.3 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
603 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
567 μs

Exercise 9. Supporting cells (Abenomics)

👀 Reading hidden code
203 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
8.3 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
598 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
62 ns
👀 Reading hidden code
8.0 μs

Exercise 10. Supporting cells (ZLB)

👀 Reading hidden code
158 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
24.5 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
134 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
191 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
24.8 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
421 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
109 μs

Exercise 11. Supporting cells (Negative demand shock)

👀 Reading hidden code
154 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
37.3 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
13.3 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
1.1 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
65.5 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
836 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
493 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
374 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
322 μs

Exercise 13. Supporting cells (secular stagnation)

👀 Reading hidden code
158 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
159 ns
👀 Reading hidden code
13.7 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
765 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
154 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
184 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
8.7 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
192 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
743 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
83.1 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
196 μs

Exercise 14. Supporting cells (Deflation trap)

👀 Reading hidden code
142 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
141 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
153 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
183 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
142 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
210 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
152 ms
👀 Reading hidden code
60.9 μs
👀 Reading hidden code
209 μs
20%